Local Government Policy in The Spatial Planning of Autonomous Regions: Between Development Interests and Environmental Sustainability

Otom Mustomi; Endang  Sutrisno; Untoro Untoro; Ratna Galuh Manika  Trisista; Abdul Haris

doi:10.51773/ajcd.v6i1.436

Authors

Otom Mustomi Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Jakarta, Indonesia
Endang Sutrisno Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
Untoro Untoro Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Jakarta, Indonesia
Ratna Galuh Manika Trisista Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Jakarta, Indonesia
Abdul Haris Faculty of Islamic Religion, Universitas Medan Area, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v6i1.436

Keywords:

Development Interests, Environmental Sustainability, Local Government, Spatial Planning

Abstract

Regional spatial planning is important in achieving sustainable development in autonomous regions. However, in its implementation, spatial planning policies often contradict the public interest, economic growth, and efforts to preserve the environment. It aims to evaluate how local governments manage spatial planning within the framework of regional autonomy and assess the extent to which the policies implemented can create a balance between regional growth and environmental protection. The research method uses the qualitative approach and involves case studies in various fields that face significant development pressures, such as industry, mining, and tourism. The study results show that although local governments can set Regional Spatial Plans (RSP), political factors, weak oversight, and investment interests often override environmental aspects. Local government policies are efforts to unite development interests with ecological conservation. This article concludes that the effectiveness of regional spatial management policies in the regions is highly dependent on institutions' ability, management quality, community involvement, and political courage in balancing the interests of development and preservation. Improved rules, the incorporation of spatial information systems, and enhanced cooperation between parties are essential to achieve fair, sustainable, and change-sensitive spatial planning at the local level. This research suggests strengthening the capabilities of regional institutions, unifying appropriate spatial data, and community participation in the spatial planning and monitoring process.

References

Bappeda Kabupaten Bogor. (2024). Evaluasi Implementasi RTRW Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2024–2044. Bappeda.

Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our Common Future. United Nations.

Danoedoro, P. (2014). Pengantar Penataan Ruang dan Pengembangan Wilayah. UGM Press.

Departemen Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Bogor. (2021). Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Kabupaten 2021. Departemen Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Bogor.

Dewi, L. S., Tan, F., & Nazer, M. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Tata Ruang Kota Bukittinggi. Region : Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perencanaan Partisipatif, 16(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.20961/region.v16i2.39852

Douglas, I. (1992). Book reviews: Caldwell, L.K. 1990: Between two worlds: sci ence, the environmental movement and policy choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. xvi + 224 pp. £32.50 cloth. ISBN: 0 521 33152 8. Progress in Human Geography, 16(3), 430–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259201600311

Dunn, W. N. (2017). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181226

Dwiyanto, A. (Ed.). (2014). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik (Cetakan keempat). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Firman, T. (2016). Spatial planning in Indonesia: From centralized to decentralized system. Springer Planning Practice & Research.

Hudalah, D., & Firman, T. (2012). Beyond property: Industrial estates and post-suburban transformation in Jakarta Metropolitan Region. Cities, 29(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.003

Jaya, B., Rustiadi, E., Fauzi, A., & Pravitasari, A. E. (2021). Land conversion and availability of agricultural land in 2035 in Puncak Area Bogor Regency. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 694(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012052

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Laporan Status Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia Tahun 2021. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia.

Mustomi, O., Lestari, Y. M., Butarbutar, Y. L., & Soulisa, I. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif dan Kualitatif. Media Penerbit Indonesia.

Mustomi, O., Sutrisno, E., Sukmadewi, Y. D., & Widyastuti, T. V. (2025). Sustainable Law: Integritas Hukum Lingkungan Dalam Kebijakan Publik. Media Penerbit Indonesia.

Sachs, N. (2008). Beyond the liability wall: Strengthening tort remedies in international environmental Law. UCLA Law Review, 55(4), 837–904.

Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature (1st ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001

Sepriani, E. (2020). Akibat Hukum Ketiadaan Kajian Lingkungan Hidup Strategis Dalam Pembentukan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah. Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum, 3(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v3i1.1181

Simarmata, H. A. (2018). Tata Ruang dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Tantangan di Era Otonomi Daerah. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Tenrisau, A. (2019). Kebijakan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Melalui Penegakan Hukum Pidana Pada Pelanggaran Terhadap Rencana Tata Ruang Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penataan Ruang. Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 2(2), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.29313/aktualita.v2i2.4817

WALHI Jawa Barat. (2023). Catatan Kritis Lingkungan Hidup Jawa Barat. WALHI Jawa Barat.