Analysis of Cases of Violence by Teachers in The School Education Environment: A Professionalism and Ethics Perspective

Authors

  • Faudina Permatasari Universitas Bhineka PGRI, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51773/ajeb.v5i2.431

Keywords:

Teacher, Violence, Professionalism, Ethical Codes

Abstract

Teacher-perpetrated violence in schools represents a violation of professionalism and ethical codes, which should serve as fundamental guidelines in education. This study examines five cases of physical violence committed by teachers in various educational institutions in Indonesia, encompassing verbal abuse, physical violence, and even sexual harassment. The study aims to identify patterns of violations, causal factors, and the impacts of such violence on students, both physically and psychologically. The research employs a qualitative descriptive method with a case study and literature review approach. Data analysis was conducted by collecting secondary data from previous studies and academic journals. The research is grounded in the theory of teacher professionalism and educational ethics to analyze violent actions committed by educators. The findings reveal that violence stems from teachers’ inability to manage emotions, the use of inappropriate disciplinary approaches, and weak oversight and enforcement of school policies. To prevent violence, professional development, consistent application of ethical codes, and strict monitoring of teacher qualifications are essential to create a violence-free educational environment.

References

Alfarisa, R. R. P. & F. (2020). Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG): Strategi pengembangan profesionalitas guru dan peningkatan mutu pendidikan Indonesia. (1995), 671–683.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Danim, S. (2012). Profesionalisasi dan etika profesi guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Depdiknas. (2003). Pedoman pencegahan kekerasan di sekolah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Detik.com. (2024). Guru SD Wonosobo dipolisikan gegara tampar murid. Diakses 29 Oktober 2024.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Indonesia, R. (n.d.-b). Undang—Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1974.

Indonesia. (2005). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Kompas. (2024). Fenomena kekerasan dalam dunia pendidikan. Jakarta: Kompas.

Latifah, W., & Muksin, N. N. (2020). Kontribusi metode coaching dalam komunikasi persuasif pegawai di RSUD R. Syamsudin, S.H., Kota Sukabumi. Sebatik, 24(2), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v24i2.1151

Lembaga Perlindungan Anak. (2003). Laporan Tahunan LPA Jawa Tengah. Semarang: LPA.

Mulyasa, E. (2010). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

UNESCO. (2021). Teachers and human rights education. Paris: UNESCO.

Pawartani, T., & Suciptaningsih, O. A. (2024). Pengembangan kompetensi guru untuk mendukung implementasi kurikulum merdeka. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 2182–2191. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3478

Putra, N. P. A., & Legowo, M. (2023). Analisis kasus kekerasan dalam pendidikan (studi kasus penganiayaan guru terhadap siswa di Jogoroto-Jombang). Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 101–106. E-ISSN: 2580-8524. Diakses dari https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/jdsb

Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Santrock, J. W. (2008). Educational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saud, U. S. (2010). Pengembangan profesi guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sidiq, U. (2018). Etika dan profesi keguruan (12th ed.). STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Sugiyanto, S. (2007). Kekerasan di sekolah dan solusinya. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tamsil, M. (2017). Tindakan kekerasan guru terhadap siswa dalam interaksi belajar mengajar (studi kasus di SMAN Surabaya). Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 72-76. e-ISSN: 2527-6891

Tempo. (2023). Guru SMK di Flores Timur celupkan tangan murid ke air mendidih. Diakses 6 Agustus 2023.

Thereza, D. N. S., Zawani, N., Tarigan, P. L., & Yunita, S. (2024). Pelanggaran kode etik guru studi kasus: Guru honorer SD cabuli siswinya di toilet sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Kreativitas Pembelajaran, 6(3), 469-473. DOI: https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/jpkp.

Ulum, M. (2011). Demitologi profesi guru. STAIN Ponorogo Press

UNICEF. (2006). Child-friendly schools manual. New York: UNICEF.

UNICEF. (2020). Global status report on preventing violence against children. New York: UNICEF.

WHO. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO.

Wibowo, D. P., Arifianto, T., Kelibia, M. U., & Mardikawati, B. (2023). Workshop peningkatan kemampuan penulisan artikel internasional terindeks scopus melalui pemanfaatan. 4(5), 10667–10674

Wulansari, F., & Fauzi, A. (2023). Pengaruh coaching dan mentoring terhadap kinerja pegawai. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 3(1), 121–126.

Yassinta, A., Sindi, P., Yelvira, M. N., Zahrawani, N. (2023). Pelanggaran kode etik berupa kekerasan fisik yang dilakukan oleh guru kepada muridnya. Nama Jurnal, 2 (1), 13-17. E-ISSN: 2963-850x Diakses dari http://e-journal.sari-mutiara.ac.id/index.php/sentra/index

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Published

2026-04-12

How to Cite

Permatasari, F. (2026). Analysis of Cases of Violence by Teachers in The School Education Environment: A Professionalism and Ethics Perspective. AMCA Journal of Education and Behavioral Change, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.51773/ajeb.v5i2.431